Market demand
Are buyers already searching for this problem?
Skip or Ship — Guides
A practical, no-budget-required guide to market research for startups — how to size a market, map competitors, and gather real customer evidence before building.
Are buyers already searching for this problem?
How crowded is the space for this exact outcome?
Can a focused team ship a credible first version quickly?
Is there a believable way to monetize early?
Do you know exactly who owns this pain day to day?
Founders often assume proper market research needs expensive tools or paid analyst reports. Most of the highest-value research — search-demand signals, competitor mapping, and direct customer conversations — is free and more reliable than a generic industry report anyway, because it's specific to your exact buyer and category.
Research is only as good as the specificity of who you're researching. “Small businesses” produces research too broad to act on. “Independent accounting practices with 5–20 staff” produces research you can actually use to find real people to talk to.
Google Trends shows whether search interest in your problem space is growing, flat, or declining over the past 24 months — a quick, free directional signal. Forum conversations (Reddit, industry-specific communities) show whether people are describing your exact problem in their own words, which is often more revealing than search volume alone.
List every direct and indirect competitor you can find, their pricing (often public), and any available revenue signals (funding announcements, review-site activity, hiring pages showing headcount). A market with zero visible competitors is usually a red flag, not an opportunity — real markets have existing solutions, even informal ones.
Skip the “the global market is worth $500B” framing entirely — it's neither credible nor useful for decision-making. Start from a specific, countable buyer population (e.g. “4,200 UK accounting practices with 5–20 staff”) and a realistic annual spend per buyer, then work upward. This produces a number you can actually defend and use to plan.
Structured interviews focused on their current workflow, existing tools, and specific frustrations — not pitching your solution. The goal is understanding their world well enough to know whether your idea genuinely fits into it, not confirming what you already believe.
Research that doesn't end in a clear decision is just accumulated information. Combine your search-demand findings, competitive landscape, market size estimate, and interview evidence into an explicit go, iterate, or skip decision — and write down the specific reasoning so you can revisit it later if circumstances change.
Once you've gathered this evidence, running it through Skip or Ship turns your qualitative research into a comparable score — useful when you're weighing multiple researched ideas against each other rather than evaluating just one in isolation. For a specific market-sizing calculation, the TAM/SAM/SOM calculator turns your bottom-up buyer count and spend estimate directly into a sized opportunity.
Direct answer
The Skip or Ship Idea Lifecycle System evaluates ideas with five consistent signals: market demand, competition intensity, execution difficulty, revenue potential, and customer clarity. Same inputs, same verdict — every time.
One buyer segment with recurring pain and a clear trigger to pay now. If that is vague, validation can't fix it.
Generic ICPs, vague outcomes, and zero distribution plan. These collapse execution speed within weeks.
One channel, one wedge use case, one pricing hypothesis to test in the next 14 days.
Move from idea generation into evidence-based validation with the core Skip or Ship Idea Lifecycle System. Free verdict, premium signal cards, no signup needed for the first run.
No. Google Trends, forum communities, competitor websites, and direct customer interviews cover most of the highest-value research, and are all free.
10 structured interviews with people genuinely matching your buyer profile typically surfaces most of the recurring patterns — fewer than 5 rarely gives you enough signal to trust the findings.
Bottom-up, always — start from a specific, countable buyer population and realistic spend per buyer, then work upward. Top-down figures ('the global market is worth $X billion') are neither credible to investors nor useful for your own planning.
Ready to pressure-test this idea with live market signals?
Validate your idea now