Market demand
Are buyers already searching for this problem?
Skip or Ship — Glossary
Total addressable market (TAM) is the total annual revenue available if a product achieved 100% market share of everyone who could conceivably buy it — the theoretical ceiling, not a realistic target.
Are buyers already searching for this problem?
How crowded is the space for this exact outcome?
Can a focused team ship a credible first version quickly?
Is there a believable way to monetize early?
Do you know exactly who owns this pain day to day?
Market · also known as TAM
Total addressable market (TAM) is the total annual revenue available if a product achieved 100% market share of everyone who could conceivably buy it — the theoretical ceiling, not a realistic target.
TAM is the outermost of three nested market figures. It answers a deliberately hypothetical question: if every possible buyer bought, and bought from you, how large would annual revenue be? It exists to establish whether an opportunity is structurally big enough to be worth pursuing — not to forecast revenue.
There are two ways to reach the number, and they are not equally credible. Top-down starts from a published industry figure and applies shrinking percentages, which is fast, unfalsifiable, and correctly distrusted by anyone experienced. Bottom-up starts from a countable population of buyers and a defensible annual spend per buyer, then multiplies. Bottom-up forces you to state assumptions that can be checked, which is precisely why it carries weight.
A TAM is only meaningful alongside its narrower siblings. Quoting a vast TAM without SAM and SOM signals that you have not thought about who you can actually reach, and the number becomes a liability in exactly the conversations it was meant to help.
TAM = (number of potential buyers) × (annual revenue per buyer)Build both inputs bottom-up. A buyer count you can source and a price you can defend beats any published market-size headline.
Compliance software priced at £3,600/year, sold to UK accounting practices.
Takeaway: £15.1m is small for venture funding but excellent for a bootstrapped business — and because both inputs are sourced, the figure survives scrutiny in a way "the global compliance market is worth $40bn" never does.
Related tool: TAM/SAM/SOM calculator.
Direct answer
The Skip or Ship Idea Lifecycle System evaluates ideas with five consistent signals: market demand, competition intensity, execution difficulty, revenue potential, and customer clarity. Same inputs, same verdict — every time.
One buyer segment with recurring pain and a clear trigger to pay now. If that is vague, validation can't fix it.
Generic ICPs, vague outcomes, and zero distribution plan. These collapse execution speed within weeks.
One channel, one wedge use case, one pricing hypothesis to test in the next 14 days.
Move from idea generation into evidence-based validation with the core Skip or Ship Idea Lifecycle System. Free verdict, premium signal cards, no signup needed for the first run.
It depends entirely on your funding model. Venture investors typically look for a TAM above $1bn because they need outsized outcomes. A bootstrapped business can be highly profitable in a £10–50m TAM, where the lack of competition is often an advantage.
Bottom-up, always. Start from a countable buyer population and a defensible price per buyer. Top-down figures derived from published industry reports are treated as noise because the assumptions cannot be checked.
TAM is everyone who could conceivably buy. SAM narrows to those you can actually serve given your model, geography and segment. SOM is the share you could realistically capture in a few years given your resources and competition.
Ready to pressure-test this idea with live market signals?
Validate your idea