Pricing model
Free tier depth, and what actually triggers the first paid step?
Skip or Ship — Compare + Decide
WorthBuild pairs idea validation with customer discovery — its report finds real people already expressing the problem, with outreach messages to contact them, plus a pitch deck and landing page generator. Skip or Ship scores the idea itself and does not surface leads or generate marketing assets.
Free tier depth, and what actually triggers the first paid step?
A scored verdict, a long report, or raw data — which does the job you need?
Seconds, minutes, or a wait — how fast is the first useful output?
Is the analysis grounded in live signals, or just an LLM's opinion?
Which use case does this tool actually win at, honestly?
Key facts
WorthBuild pairs idea validation with customer discovery — its report finds real people already expressing the problem, with outreach messages to contact them, plus a pitch deck and landing page generator. Skip or Ship scores the idea itself and does not surface leads or generate marketing assets.
| WorthBuild | Skip or Ship | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | One free validation per month, no card required | Free first-pass verdict, no signup, no card |
| Paid entry price | $5 one-time (single report) | $2.99 credit pack |
| Bundle pricing | $20 for 5 reports (one-time, credits don't expire) | Credit packs from $2.99; no subscription |
| Scoring | Go / Pivot / Stop verdict; rubric and weighting not disclosed | Deterministic — 10 fixed weights applied in code after evaluation |
| Customer discovery | Surfaces real people discussing the problem, with outreach messages | Not offered |
| Output | Market analysis, competitor intel, unit economics, risk assessment, pitch deck and landing page generation | Ship / Fix / Skip verdict, per-category scores, brutal analysis |
WorthBuild details were read from their own site on 2026-09-04. Pricing and features change — check the current figures before deciding.
Skip or Ship scores ten categories — real pain, demand, defensibility, competition, clarity, monetisation, distribution, execution difficulty, speed to MVP and name strength — and applies fixed weights to them in code, after the model has evaluated each one. That is why the same description always produces the same verdict, and why a score that moves tells you the idea changed rather than the model did.
Whether that matters depends on what you are doing. If you are iterating on one idea and want to know whether a revision actually improved it, a stable scale is the whole point. If you want a research document, brand assets or live sourced data, the comparison above shows where WorthBuild does things Skip or Ship does not.
Direct answer — Skip or Ship vs WorthBuild
WorthBuild pairs idea validation with customer discovery — its report finds real people already expressing the problem, with outreach messages to contact them, plus a pitch deck and landing page generator. Skip or Ship scores the idea itself and does not surface leads or generate marketing assets.
Describe your idea and the Skip or Ship engine returns a Ship, Fix, or Skip verdict with a full 10-category score breakdown — free, in 30 seconds, no signup.
One validation per month is free with no card required. Beyond that, single reports are $5 one-time, or $20 for a 5-report bundle whose credits don't expire — there's no subscription. Skip or Ship's first-pass verdict is free every time, with no monthly cap.
Yes — its report includes a 'First Customers' feature that surfaces real people already discussing the problem online, along with drafted outreach messages. This is a genuine point of difference; Skip or Ship scores the idea but doesn't search for or surface individual leads.
Its site states reports include a Go / Pivot / Stop verdict 'backed by real data' but doesn't publish the underlying rubric or category weights. Skip or Ship's 10 weighted categories and their exact percentages are documented at /how-it-works.
Last reviewed
Ready to pressure-test this idea with live market signals?
Try the free verdict